Posts

Showing posts with the label HIGH COURT ORDER

Termination of the LARSGESS Scheme in view of directions of Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana and the orders of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India- Railway Board

Image
Termination of the LARSGESS Scheme in view of directions of Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana and the orders of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India- Railway Board Termination of the LARSGESS Scheme in view of directions of Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana and the orders of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) No. 508/2018 dated 08.01.2018 Government of India Ministry of Railways  Railway Board RBE. No. 150/2018 No. E(P&A)I-2015/RT -43 Dated: 26.09.2018  The General Managers,  All Indian Railways.  (Attn: CPOs)  Sub: Termination of the LARSGESS Scheme in view of directions of Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana and the orders of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) No. 508/2018 dated 08.01.2018 Ref:   Board’s letter of even number dated 27.10.2017.  The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in its judgement dated 27.04.16 in CWP No. 7714 of 2016 had held that the Safety Related Retirement Scheme...

Important- Delhi High Court Judgement on MACPs

Important- Delhi High Court Judgement on MACPs IMPORTANT - DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT ON MACP IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 06.07.2017 Pronounced on: 20.12.2017 + W.P.(C) 9357/2016 HARI RAM & ANR ..... Petitioners Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Padma Kumar S., Sh. Amandeep Joshi and Sh. Himanshu Gautam, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, DELHI HIGH COURT..... Respondent Through : Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, Sh. Rhishabh Jetley, Ms. Pratishtha Vij and Sh. Urvi Mohan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. 1. Complaining of unjustified denial of third financial upgradation under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (hereafter called “MACPS”, for convenience), the writ petitioners approach this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for appropriate directions. 2. Both the petitioners joined the establishment of the High Court initially...